Courtroom strategy notes
Read about online lawyer games, courtroom simulation, case-building, and argument strategy.
Courtroom strategy notes
Explore case reports from Legal Arena's simulated proceedings: the disputes, evidence, outcomes, and arguments that made the difference.
Latest posts
Practical essays for players who want sharper interviews, cleaner case theories, and better courtroom arguments.
The evidence did not establish whether the warning sign was visible before entry. The court also rejected the assertion that holding a phone proved distraction.
The messages supported possession and a missed return promise, but did not prove dishonest taking or establish that Faris Rahman still had the item.
The State proved Price took the tablet, but not that he knew it belonged to the cafe at the time. The court found the video and later conduct insufficient to resolve that question.
The court found no established consent to the full withdrawal and restricted further nonroutine use of joint savings pending written agreement or court approval.
The court found Elena Mercer earned the Saturday wages but held that she had not proved they remained unpaid. It did not find that Graham Bellamy had paid her.
The court found that Leah Brenner worked at Martin Voss’s request, but held that the messages and payroll records did not establish eight hours or support a smaller award.
The court found insufficient evidence supporting entitlement to a hearing, while declining to treat the agency's entry allegation as independently proven.
The court found that a manager’s attendance instruction outweighed the session’s optional label, while pay records established that the four training hours remained unpaid.
The application was dismissed after Erin Walsh did not prove that her online review request was completed and received by the 14 May deadline.
The District Court entered judgment for Owen Price after finding that an image shown on Lena Price’s phone was made with Photoshop or AI.
The court found Harbor & Pine’s text showed required, work-like training, but held that Erin Caldwell did not prove the precise $240 wage calculation.
The Commission found Wallace identified a $125.70 claim but did not prove the shift was guaranteed or that its removal was retaliation for her wage inquiry.
