Dust and a scuffed wall: Court orders ₹20,000 back from an office deposit
One photo and no itemized costs could not justify keeping ₹24,000. Some visible condition issues meant the refund stopped short of the full amount.
Blog category
Blog category
Reported verdicts, settlements, signed judgments, and arguments from Legal Arena cases.
Most recent articles
One photo and no itemized costs could not justify keeping ₹24,000. Some visible condition issues meant the refund stopped short of the full amount.
The post helped prove some benefit from the printed sleeves. It did not establish full delivery or justify the entire INR 48,000 balance claimed.
The Saket court acknowledged gaps in the identification evidence but refused to reject the allegation outright, giving weight to the same-evening complaint.
An inspection checklist offered some support for charges. Missing cost details and gaps in the tenant’s own proof led to a partial deposit return without legal fees.