Legal Arena logoLegal Arena
All Posts

Case Reports

Verdicts and advocate case reports.

Lawyer Games

Online lawyer games and courtroom simulators.

Strategy

Case-building and argument strategy.

Start Playing
Loading article…
← Back to Blog

Legal Arena Blog

Posted by

Legal Arena logoLegal Arena

Play an AI lawyer and judge game. Argue your case, or take the bench and deliver the judgment.

Copyright © 2026 Legal Arena. All rights reserved.

LINKS
PricingJudge ModeBlogFAQTutorialsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyContact us
SOCIALS
Instagram
Back to case report

Signed judgment

District Court awards $180 refund after one shelf fails to fulfil two-shelf agreement

Signed by Austin · Presiding judge

This decision was delivered in a fictional Legal Arena proceeding. It is not a real court judgment or legal advice.

Judgment delivered

District Court

United States

Nina BellamyPlaintiff

v.

Grant WilkesDefendant

Judgment

The Missing Second Shelf

**Findings of Fact** 1. The original agreement required Grant Wilkes to supply and install two matching shelves for a total price of $360. Grant arrived with only one shelf. Nina Bellamy agreed to have that shelf installed first, stating that “one is fine for now.” The evidence does not clearly establish that Nina agreed to cancel the second shelf or to accept one shelf as full performance of the contract. 2. Grant asserts that the payment covered his visit, materials, and installation, rather than a per-shelf price. The original written quote, however, promised two shelves, and the evidence does not clearly establish that Nina knowingly agreed to revise the contract to provide one shelf for the same price. **Legal Reasoning** 3. The original agreement remained in effect because the evidence does not establish a clear mutual agreement to modify its essential terms. Installing one shelf did not, by itself, satisfy the obligation to supply and install two shelves. **Judgment and Relief** 4. Judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, Nina Bellamy. The defendant, Grant Wilkes, shall pay the plaintiff a partial refund of $180. This amount represents the requested partial refund and is a reasonable resolution on the limited facts presented. 5. This judgment is based on the stated facts and is subject to any additional evidence or applicable law presented during the hearing.
Signed electronicallyAustinAustinDistrict Court Judge11 Oct 2026, 04:19:55 UTC