Back to case report
Signed judgment
District Court directs return of $240 deposit deduction in carpet stain dispute
Signed by Jacob · Presiding judge
This decision was delivered in a fictional Legal Arena proceeding. It is not a real court judgment or legal advice.
District Court
United States
Erin BellPlaintiff
v.Curtis VanceDefendant
Judgment
The Carpet Deduction
1. Curtis has provided little evidence and appears to have limited recollection of the relevant events.
2. Erin has provided evidence and acted appropriately in contacting Curtis, but received no assistance from him.
So my decision is gonna be to Return the $240 to Erin