Courtroom strategy notes
Read about online lawyer games, courtroom simulation, case-building, and argument strategy.
Courtroom strategy notes
Explore case reports from Legal Arena's simulated proceedings: the disputes, evidence, outcomes, and arguments that made the difference.
Latest posts
Practical essays for players who want sharper interviews, cleaner case theories, and better courtroom arguments.
The agreement resolves a dispute over money sent to help Caleb Ellison settle into a new place. He denied that the transfer was a loan.
The seller accepted that the mixer failed early but said its cause and repairability were unknown. A question about repair time did not amount to accepting a repair.
A next-day text showed Elena Mercer expected the money back, but did not establish that Daniel Mercer had agreed to repay it before the transfer.
A routine clean was booked before inspection, but the court said the evidence did not establish whether the charge was attributable to the tenant. It did not find she caused a mark.
A text reported water by the door 18 minutes before Elena Park fell, while Graham Ellis said he had checked the entrance and seen none.
A receipt set a May 9 pickup, but a later text linked a darker color to May 12. The court found the buyer’s reply ambiguous and the events after the readiness notice unresolved.
A saved email was described as showing two menu-named attachments, but neither the email nor the files were presented for the court to inspect.
The parents disputed whether a school payment counted toward maintenance and whether a R28,000 deposit reflected available income. The judge called for further financial disclosure.
A receipt proved the price, not the fault. The court accepted the buyer’s account of the kettle switching off and found that her message did not accept a replacement.
The seller suspected the blender had been overloaded but had not seen it used or tested it. The judge found it broke during reasonable use.
A signed order set a June 8 delivery date, but a message about bringing the bookshelf four days later did not establish that the buyer agreed to an extension.
A cleaning invoice showed an expense, but not why cleaning was needed. A move-out photo showed clean-looking carpet, though it captured only part of the room.
