Back to case report
Recorded verdict summary
Unfinished shelves, an undocumented wall problem: Court orders €180 back
This decision was delivered in a fictional Legal Arena proceeding. It is not a real court judgment or legal advice.
A full judgment was not saved for this case. The original verdict summary is shown below.
You proved the agreement and the €180 advance, and the other side did not justify keeping the money with itemized costs, actual expenses, or specific condition evidence. Applying Rule 21, Rule 22, Rule 2, and, where relevant, the deposit-style burden logic reflected in Rule 11, the record supports repayment of the advance. The wall concern was raised only orally and was not documented enough to defeat your claim on this record. A full €180 refund is warranted, while the separate €40 removal-cost request is not proven on the visible record.