Signed judgment

Findings 1. The Court has considered the evidence and the parties’ final statements. 2. In a May 3 message, Caleb expressly identified the $600 transfer as repayment for the car-repair advance Erin had covered. Erin’s contemporaneous reply acknowledged receipt on those terms. On May 8, after Erin had paid the full $1,200 rent, she requested Caleb’s separate $600 share. Caleb replied that he could cover it. No message, receipt notation, or other record reallocates the May 3 payment to rent, and Caleb identified no specific words or corroborating evidence of such an agreement. 3. Caleb’s general recollection of an earlier discussion about contributing $600 does not overcome the clear written characterization of the May 3 transfer or his own May 8 response. The evidence establishes that the rent obligation remained unpaid. Order 4. Caleb shall pay Erin $600 toward the final month’s shared rent. Credit shall be given for any payment later shown to have satisfied that specific obligation. No further relief is granted. 5. The matter is concluded.