Back to case report
Signed judgment
District Court orders $300 rent payment, rejecting claimed credit for internet bills
Signed by keina47 · Presiding judge
This decision was delivered in a fictional Legal Arena proceeding. It is not a real court judgment or legal advice.
District Court
United States
Elise MercerPlaintiff
v.Nolan MercerDefendant
Judgment
The Last Shared Rent Payment
1. Having heard the parties, I find that the defendant is responsible for paying the plaintiff the requested sum of $300.
Findings
2. The parties agreed to split the rent. They did not agree to split the bill. Accordingly, the bill is not to be considered in determining their agreement to split the rent.
3. The defendant did not pay half of the rent and therefore breached the agreement.
Reasons
4. Under Rule 1, a claim requires proof. The defendant presented no proof that the agreement differed from the account given by both parties.
5. The defendant stated that the parties had agreed to split the rent. It is therefore unnecessary to assume that the plaintiff had to prove the defendant’s responsibility for agreeing to that arrangement; the defendant acknowledged the agreement himself.
Order
6. The defendant shall pay the plaintiff $300.