Back to case report
Signed judgment
District Court grants tenant return of 6,000 AFN deposit withheld for repainting
Signed by Chris · Presiding judge
This decision was delivered in a fictional Legal Arena proceeding. It is not a real court judgment or legal advice.
District Court
Afghanistan
Farid AkbariPlaintiff
v.Hamid SafiDefendant
Judgment
The Deposit and the Repainted Room
1. Farid Akbari is entitled to the return of the 6,000 AFN deposit. Hamid Safi is not entitled to that amount, as the evidence is insufficient to establish his claim. Farid Akbari has provided a photograph and acknowledges shortcomings in his own testimony. Nevertheless, people must be paid for the work they perform, regardless of the outcome.