A website that could not be used: Court orders €450 back from a €600 deposit
The developer could not justify keeping the full advance. Partial work and late client inputs also stood in the way of a complete refund.
Blog category
Legal Arena reports about contract violation.
Most recent articles
The developer could not justify keeping the full advance. Partial work and late client inputs also stood in the way of a complete refund.
The workshop raised cancellation as its defense, but produced no itemized costs or specific refund terms to outweigh the customer’s documents.
The maker blamed design changes. The Rosario court found no agreed replacement deadline or basis to keep the advance after prolonged non-delivery.
The baker argued that collection settled the issue. Nairobi’s court gave more weight to the written promise about the graduation cake’s style.
A weather-delay explanation and missing cost records put the $600 deposit in dispute. Unclear refund terms led to a reduced award.
The Lahore court favored the customer’s written evidence, but uncertainty over the postponement sequence cut the refund below the PKR 35,000 claimed.
The painter did not justify keeping the deposit for the unfinished hallway. The court refused a separate £45 paint claim because the expense was not proved.
The contractor could not substantiate an advance weather warning or a disclosed nonrefundable term. The Columbus court ordered the payment returned.
One photo and no itemized costs could not justify keeping ₹24,000. Some visible condition issues meant the refund stopped short of the full amount.